3D Secure Authentication
Before implementing 3DS, ensure you understand:
- AVS & CVV basics (complementary controls)
- Risk scoring concepts (determines when to trigger 3DS)
- Your current fraud metrics baseline
- Authorization basics and auth rate impact
- 3DS = Authentication that shifts fraud liability from you to issuer on CNP transactions
- Worth it if: Fraud over 0.5%, approaching Visa thresholds, margins can absorb 2-5% auth drop
- Liability shift: Visa ECI 05 = full shift; Mastercard SLI 1 = full shift; anything else = you're liable
- Frictionless rate: More data sent = 60-90% frictionless (no challenge); send everything you have
- Roll out in phases: high-risk segments first, measure for 2 weeks, expand or kill
If you're thinking about declining a transaction for fraud, use 3DS instead.
When your fraud rules flag a transaction as risky, you have two options:
- Decline it - You lose the sale. If it was a good customer, they're gone.
- Trigger 3DS - The issuer authenticates them. If they pass, you get liability shift AND the sale. If they fail or abandon, you've lost nothing you wouldn't have lost anyway.
3DS is not just a fraud prevention tool. It's a recovery mechanism for transactions your rules would otherwise kill.
Liability shift only covers fraud chargebacks (Visa 10.4, Mastercard 4837).
Customers can still dispute for:
- Merchandise not received - Package lost or never shipped
- Not as described - Product doesn't match what you sold
- Services not rendered - You didn't deliver what was promised
- Credit not processed - You owe them a refund and didn't give it
- Processing errors - Duplicate charges, wrong amounts
A fully authenticated transaction that results in an unhappy customer is still a chargeback waiting to happen. 3DS protects you from "I didn't do it" fraud. It doesn't protect you from bad fulfillment, misleading product descriptions, or poor customer service.
3DS shifts liability to the issuer for authenticated CNP transactions. But it also adds friction that kills conversion for some merchants.
Before you flip the switch everywhere, run an experiment.
Population: Orders over $200 from customers with fewer than 2 prior purchases
Control: Same segment, no 3DS challenge
Metrics: Auth rate, cart abandonment, fraud rate, CB ratio (reason code 10.4)
Guardrail: Auth rate can't drop more than 3%
Run length: 2 weeks or 1,000 transactions per variant
Kill criteria: If auth rate drops more than 5% in first 3 days with no fraud improvement, turn it off
If you turn 3DS on for a segment, you're trading an expected auth rate drop (typically 2-5%) for liability shift on fraud chargebacks.
That's worth it if:
- Your fraud rate is high (over 0.5%)
- You're approaching Visa thresholds (0.65%+)
- Your margins can absorb the conversion hit
It's probably NOT worth it if:
- Your fraud rate is already low (under 0.3%)
- Your margins are thin (see interchange optimization)
- Your customer base is older/less tech-savvy (higher challenge abandonment)
Write down your assumptions before you start. Revisit them in 30 days.
How 3DS Works
| Version | Status | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| 3DS 1.0 | Deprecated | Static passwords, high friction |
| 3DS 2.0 | Current | Risk-based, frictionless options |
| 3DS 2.1 | Current | Enhanced data, mobile support |
| 3DS 2.2 | Current | SCA compliance, exemptions |
Brand Names
| Network | 3DS Brand Name |
|---|---|
| Visa | Visa Secure |
| Mastercard | Mastercard Identity Check |
| American Express | American Express SafeKey |
| Discover | ProtectBuy |
Liability Shift Rules
This is the whole point. When 3DS authentication succeeds, fraud liability shifts from you to the issuer.
Visa (ECI Values)
| ECI | Meaning | Liability Shift |
|---|---|---|
| 05 | Fully authenticated | ✅ Yes, to issuer |
| 06 | Attempted, issuer not available | ⚠️ Partial |
| 07 | Not authenticated / Failed | ❌ No, merchant liable |
Mastercard (SLI Values)
| SLI | Meaning | Liability |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fully authenticated (first-party) | Issuer |
| 2 | Delegated authentication | Issuer |
| Other | Not authenticated | Merchant |
When Liability Does NOT Shift
Even with authentication:
- Mail order/telephone order (MOTO)
- Recurring transactions (after initial)
- Merchant-initiated transactions (MIT) - see recurring billing compliance
- Certain MCC exclusions
Frictionless vs. Challenge Flow
Frictionless Authentication
The issuer's risk engine decides the cardholder is low-risk and authenticates without interaction.
Benefits:
- Better conversion (no extra steps)
- Faster checkout
- Still provides liability shift
Challenge Flow
Cardholder must complete verification (OTP, biometric, etc.).
When triggered:
- High-risk transaction signals
- Issuer policy
- Cardholder behavior anomalies
- Amount thresholds
Impact on Frictionless Rate
More data = higher frictionless rate:
| Data Quality | Typical Frictionless Rate |
|---|---|
| Minimal data | 30-50% |
| Good data | 60-75% |
| Excellent data | 80-90%+ |
Send everything you have: shipping address, email, phone, device info, customer history, IP address.
Rollout Strategy
Don't turn it on everywhere at once.
Phase 1: High-Risk Only (Week 1-2)
Start with segments where fraud is concentrated:
- High-risk BINs (prepaid, certain countries) - see going global
- New customers with no history
- Orders over your average fraud amount
Measure: CB rate change, auth rate change, cart abandonment.
Phase 2: Expand or Kill (Week 3-4)
If Phase 1 shows improvement:
- Expand to medium-risk segments
- Keep monitoring auth rate closely
If Phase 1 shows no fraud improvement and auth dropped:
- Kill it
- Try a different segment or approach
Phase 3: Steady State
Once you find segments where 3DS works:
- Lock in those rules
- Monitor monthly for drift
- Re-test quarterly as issuer behavior changes
- Small samples: 500 transactions isn't enough to measure fraud rate changes. You need thousands.
- Seasonality: Fraud patterns shift. A rule that works in December may fail in March.
- Issuer behavior changes: Frictionless rates depend on issuer risk engines, which update constantly.
- Selection bias: If you only enable 3DS on high-risk orders, of course it will look effective. Compare to a control.
3DS Exemptions: When to Skip Authentication
Even when SCA is required (Europe) or you want liability shift, certain transactions can skip 3DS. Understanding exemptions is critical for optimizing conversion while maintaining compliance.
Exemption Types
| Exemption | Criteria | Who Decides |
|---|---|---|
| Low value | Under €30 (€100 cumulative limit) | Issuer |
| Low risk (TRA) | Based on fraud rate thresholds | Acquirer or Issuer |
| Recurring/MIT | After initial authenticated transaction | Merchant initiates (see subscriptions) |
| Corporate cards | Secure corporate payment process | Issuer (see B2B) |
| Trusted beneficiary | Cardholder whitelisted merchant | Cardholder/Issuer |
| Secure corporate | Dedicated payment processes | Varies |
Transaction Risk Analysis (TRA) Thresholds
TRA exemptions are based on your fraud rate. Lower fraud rate = higher exemption threshold.
| Your Fraud Rate | Exemption Threshold |
|---|---|
| Below 0.13% | Up to €100 |
| Below 0.06% | Up to €250 |
| Below 0.01% | Up to €500 |
Reality check: Most merchants can't claim TRA exemptions because they don't have the verified fraud rate data or the acquirer support.
Exemption Decision Flow
Exemption Risks
| Risk | Description |
|---|---|
| Issuer decline | Issuer can reject exemption request |
| Liability stays with you | Exempted transactions = no liability shift |
| Ratio impact | Fraud on exempted transactions counts against you |
| Cumulative tracking | Low-value exemptions have limits |
When to Request Exemptions
| Request Exemption | Don't Request |
|---|---|
| Repeat customers with history | First-time high-risk orders |
| Low-value transactions | High-value orders |
| Low-risk profile | Any fraud signals present |
| Conversion-critical flow | When liability shift matters |
Implementation Notes
"Do you support 3DS exemption requests? Which exemption types can we request? How do we flag transactions for TRA?"
Not all processors support all exemptions. Verify:
- Which exemptions your processor can request
- How to flag transactions for exemption
- What data is required for TRA
- How declined exemptions are handled (fallback to full 3DS?)
Exemption Strategy by Business Type
| Business Type | Recommended Approach |
|---|---|
| Subscriptions | Authenticate first payment, MIT exemption for renewals |
| High-frequency, low-value | Request low-value exemption, accept liability |
| High-value goods | Full authentication, don't exempt |
| Return customers | Trusted beneficiary (if supported) |
| Mixed | Segment by risk, exempt low-risk only |
Chargeback Handling for 3DS
When you get a fraud chargeback on an authenticated transaction, include the authentication data in your representment response.
Mastercard (4837):
AUTH MMDDYY/NNNNNN SL 1
Visa (10.4): Include ECI value, CAVV, and 3DS transaction ID.
When 3DS Doesn't Protect
Even with authentication, chargebacks can occur for:
- Non-fraud reason codes (13.x)
- Services not rendered (see 13.3)
- Goods not received (see 13.1)
- Processing errors
- Authentication data errors
Metrics to Watch
Track these during your experiment:
| Metric | What It Tells You |
|---|---|
| Frictionless rate | How often issuers are letting transactions through without challenge |
| Challenge completion rate | How many customers complete the challenge vs. abandon |
| Auth rate by ECI | Are you getting liability shift or just friction? |
| Cart abandonment | Measure at checkout step, not just overall |
| CB ratio on 10.4/4837 | The fraud chargebacks you're trying to prevent |
The Bet Framing
Sometimes the "right" decision loses a specific fight, but you keep it because expected value is positive over many fights.
3DS will occasionally let through a fraudster who passes the challenge. It will also occasionally cause a good customer to abandon. That's fine. The question is whether, across thousands of transactions, you're better off with it than without it.
If you're not measuring, you're not betting. You're just guessing.
Next Steps
If 3DS is working for you:
- Risk Scoring - Combine with scoring for precision
- Velocity Rules - Catch what 3DS misses
- Fraud Metrics - Track your improvement
If 3DS is killing conversion:
- AVS & CVV - Lower-friction alternatives
- Device Fingerprinting - Passive signals
- Rules vs ML - Other approaches
Fighting 3DS chargebacks:
- Visa 10.4 - CNP Fraud - Reason code details
- Mastercard 4837 - Fraud - Mastercard specifics
- Compelling Evidence Guide - Win with authentication data
See Also
- Risk Scoring - Combining 3DS with scoring
- AVS & CVV - Complementary verification controls
- Velocity Rules - Catching what 3DS misses
- Device Fingerprinting - Passive fraud signals
- Fraud Metrics - Measuring detection performance
- Chargeback Metrics - Tracking dispute rates
- Network Programs - Visa/MC thresholds
- Checkout Conversion - Friction impact
- Auth Optimization - Improving approval rates
- Issuer Perspective - How issuers evaluate 3DS
- Subscriptions & Recurring - MIT after initial auth
- Representment - Fighting authenticated disputes