Refund Fraud
TL;DR
- Refund fraud = Exploiting return/refund policies to get money or goods without legitimate cause
- Common schemes: wardrobing, empty box returns, "did not receive" claims, double-dipping (refund + chargeback)
- "Refund-as-a-service" criminal services now openly advertised
- Detect via: high refund rate (>15%), weight mismatches, serial number changes
- Related to friendly fraud and chargeback management
Exploiting return and refund policies for financial gain.
Definition
Refund fraud involves manipulating return processes, exploiting refund policies, or making fraudulent claims to obtain money or goods without legitimate cause.
Common Schemes
Return Fraud Variants
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Wardrobing | Use item, return with tags still attached |
| Receipt fraud | Use found/stolen receipts to return shoplifted goods |
| Price switching | Swap tags, return at higher price |
| Empty box | Return empty box or box with wrong item |
| Cross-retailer | Buy at Store A, return at Store B |
Refund Fraud Variants
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Double dipping | Get refund from merchant AND chargeback |
| Did Not Receive (DNR) | Claim package not delivered (see 13.1 reason code) |
| Item Not As Described (INAD) | Exaggerate issues for refund (see 13.3 reason code) |
| Partial return | Return only part of multi-item order |
| Refund-as-a-service | Criminal services that process fraudulent refunds |
"Refund-as-a-Service" Economy
Growing Threat
Professional refund fraud services offer:
- Guaranteed refunds for a percentage fee (15-40%)
- Social engineering scripts
- Fake tracking numbers
- Claim processing for consumers
These services are openly advertised on social media and forums.
Detection Signals
Customer-Level
| Signal | Risk Level |
|---|---|
| High refund rate (>15% of orders) | 🔴 High |
| Multiple "not received" claims | 🔴 High |
| Refund requested immediately after delivery | ⚠️ Medium |
| Returns always at max allowed timeframe | ⚠️ Medium |
| Returns of high-theft items (electronics, designer) | ⚠️ Medium |
Transaction-Level
| Signal | Risk Level |
|---|---|
| Weight difference (return vs. original) | 🔴 High |
| Serial number mismatch | 🔴 High |
| Item condition inconsistent with claim | ⚠️ Medium |
| Photo evidence doesn't match claim | 🔴 High |
Prevention Strategies
Policy Design
- Receipt requirements – Original payment method for refund
- Restocking fees – Reduce wardrobing incentive
- Time limits – Shorter return windows
- Condition requirements – Clear usage definitions
- Refund method – Original payment method only
Operational Controls
- Verify delivery – Photo, signature, GPS
- Weight checking – Compare return weight
- Serial number tracking – Match on return
- Abuse tracking – Flag serial abusers
- Refund velocity limits – Caps per customer per period
Technology
- Return probability scoring – ML on return likelihood
- Customer abuse scoring – Lifetime return behavior
- Network analysis – Link related accounts (via device fingerprinting)
Next Steps
Detecting refund abuse?
- Check customer-level signals - High refund rates
- Verify transaction-level signals - Weight, serial mismatches
- Set up velocity limits - Caps per customer
Preventing refund fraud?
- Review policy design - Tighten return policies
- Implement operational controls - Weight checking, serial tracking
- Track abuse history - Flag serial abusers
Fighting refund-related chargebacks?
- Review compelling evidence - What wins
- Check refund strategy - When to refund vs fight
- Set up alerts - Pre-dispute resolution
Related Topics
- Friendly Fraud - Chargeback abuse
- Chargeback Management - Full chargeback guide
- Compelling Evidence - Fighting refund-related disputes
- Velocity Rules - Detecting refund abuse patterns
- Refund Strategy - When to refund vs. fight
- Reason Codes - Understanding dispute types
- Card-Present Fraud - Employee refund schemes
- Representment - Fighting refund disputes
- Device Fingerprinting - Link serial abusers
- Chargeback Alerts - Pre-dispute resolution
- Chargeback Metrics - Tracking refund-related disputes
- First-Party Fraud - Intentional abuse patterns