Skip to main content

E2EE vs P2PE

On this page

Both encrypt card data at the terminal. Only one is validated by the PCI SSC and automatically reduces your PCI scope.

If you're buying terminals, this distinction can save you thousands in compliance costs.

The Core Difference​

E2EEP2PE
Full nameEnd-to-End EncryptionPoint-to-Point Encryption
What it doesEncrypts card data at terminalEncrypts card data at terminal
Who validates itVendor claimsPCI SSC validates
PCI scope reductionMaybe, assessor decidesGuaranteed (SAQ P2PE)
Device optionsManyFewer (must be validated)
CostLowerHigher

The key: P2PE is E2EE that's been formally validated by the PCI Security Standards Council. The encryption works the same way, but P2PE comes with proof.

How the Encryption Works​

Both E2EE and P2PE encrypt card data the moment it enters the terminal:

What you never see: The unencrypted card number. It goes straight from the chip to encrypted ciphertext. Your POS system, your network, your servers never touch raw card data.

PCI Scope Impact​

This is where P2PE pays for itself.

Without P2PE (Standard PCI Assessment)​

Everything that touches or could touch card data is in scope:

  • Terminals
  • Network between terminal and server
  • POS system
  • Back-office systems with transaction data
  • Any connected systems

Result: SAQ D (or full ROC for Level 1), 300+ requirements

With Validated P2PE​

Only the P2PE terminal is in scope:

  • P2PE terminal (validated, managed by solution provider)
  • That's it

Result: SAQ P2PE, ~30 requirements

Scope Comparison​

ElementWithout P2PEWith P2PE
TerminalsIn scopeManaged by provider
NetworkIn scopeOut of scope
POS softwareIn scopeOut of scope
Back-officeIn scopeOut of scope
Vulnerability scansRequiredReduced
Penetration testsRequiredMay not be required
SAQ typeD (329 questions)P2PE (~33 questions)

What Makes P2PE "Validated"​

For a solution to be PCI-validated P2PE, it must meet requirements across the entire chain:

ComponentRequirement
TerminalsPCI PTS POI validated devices
EncryptionDUKPT or equivalent key management
Key injectionSecure key injection facility (KIF)
DecryptionHardware Security Module (HSM) at processor
Chain of custodyDocumented from manufacture to deployment
ProviderListed on PCI SSC website

Check the list: PCI SSC Validated P2PE Solutions

E2EE: The Unvalidated Option​

E2EE does the same encryption but without formal validation.

When E2EE Is Fine​

ScenarioWhy E2EE Works
Small merchant, simple setupCompliance burden already low
Using PayFac (Stripe Terminal, Square)PayFac handles most compliance
SAQ B or B-IP alreadyLimited scope anyway
Budget constraintsP2PE premium not justified

When E2EE Is Risky​

ScenarioWhy You Need P2PE
Level 1 merchantROC complexity makes P2PE savings huge
Complex networkSegmentation requirements are hard
Multiple locationsScope reduction multiplies
Regulated industryAuditors want validated solutions

Cost Comparison​

Terminal Costs​

TypeTypical Price Range
Basic E2EE terminal$200-400
P2PE validated terminal$400-800
Premium P2PE terminal$600-1,200

Total Cost of Ownership​

The terminal premium is often offset by compliance savings:

Cost ElementE2EEP2PE
Terminal$300$600
Annual PCI assessment$5,000-20,000$1,000-3,000
Vulnerability scans$1,000-3,000/yrReduced/none
Penetration tests$5,000-15,000/yrMay not apply
Network segmentation$2,000-10,000Not required
Staff time40-100 hrs/yr5-15 hrs/yr

Break-even: For most merchants with more than a few terminals, P2PE pays for itself in year one.

Implementation Considerations​

Choosing a P2PE Solution​

Questions to ask:

□ Is the solution on the PCI SSC validated list?
□ What terminals are included?
□ What's the monthly/annual fee?
□ Who manages key injection?
□ What's the support model?
□ What's the contract term?
□ Can I use the terminals if I switch processors?

Migration from E2EE to P2PE​

StepConsideration
1. Evaluate solutionsMatch to your processor
2. Terminal swapMay need new devices
3. Key injectionProvider handles
4. TestingValidate transactions work
5. Re-assess PCIFile SAQ P2PE

Common Gotchas​

IssueImpact
Mixed environmentsOne non-P2PE terminal = full scope
Manual key entryKeyed transactions may not be covered
Solution provider changeMay need terminal swap
Terminal tamperingBreaks P2PE chain

P2PE Limitations​

P2PE doesn't cover everything:

Not Covered by P2PEWhy
E-commerceNo terminal involved
Keyed transactionsManual entry bypasses terminal
Stored card dataP2PE is transit encryption
Phone ordersNo terminal
Chargebacks/disputesDifferent process

Mixed environment: If you have both terminal and e-commerce, you need P2PE for terminals AND separate controls for e-commerce.

Decision Framework​

Quick Decision​

Your SituationRecommendation
Single location, simple setup, PayFacE2EE is fine
Multiple locationsConsider P2PE
Level 1 or 2 merchantP2PE recommended
Regulated industry (healthcare, finance)P2PE recommended
Complex networkP2PE recommended
Tight budget, low volumeE2EE acceptable

Test to Run​

P2PE ROI calculation:

Current annual PCI costs:
  Assessment/SAQ:           $________
  Vulnerability scans:      $________
  Penetration test:         $________
  Network segmentation:     $________
  Staff time (hrs × rate):  $________
  Total:                    $________

P2PE costs:
  Terminal premium:         $________ (one-time)
  Annual P2PE fee:          $________
  SAQ P2PE assessment:      $________
  Total year 1:             $________
  Total year 2+:            $________

Savings: $________ per year after year 1

Scale Callout​

Business SizeRecommendation
Single location, under $100k/moE2EE through PayFac is fine
2-5 locationsEvaluate P2PE, likely worth it
5+ locationsP2PE almost certainly saves money
Level 1 merchantP2PE strongly recommended
FranchiseP2PE simplifies franchisee compliance

Where This Breaks​

  1. Mixed environments. If any terminal isn't P2PE, your entire card-present environment is in full scope. All or nothing.

  2. Keyed entry. If staff manually key card numbers (phone orders, terminal issues), those transactions aren't covered by P2PE.

  3. Solution provider lock-in. P2PE terminals are often tied to specific providers. Switching may require new hardware.

  4. Tampering. If a P2PE terminal is tampered with, the validation is void. Physical security still matters.

Next Steps​

Evaluating P2PE?

  1. Check PCI SSC validated list → Is your processor's solution listed?
  2. Calculate ROI → Use the template above
  3. Ask your processor → What P2PE options do they support?

Already have terminals?

  1. Check what you have → E2EE or P2PE?
  2. Evaluate migration → Cost to switch vs. compliance savings
  3. Consider at refresh → Next terminal purchase

Implementing P2PE?

  1. Choose validated solution → From PCI SSC list
  2. Plan deployment → Terminal swap, training
  3. Update PCI assessment → File SAQ P2PE

See Also​