FX and Settlement (Operator Field Manual)
Cross-border fees hide in FX. Settlement timing hides in processor policy. Know what you’re paying and when the money arrives.
Last verified: Dec 2025. FX markups and policies change; confirm with your processor.
What Matters (5 bullets)
- “FX markup” is often the biggest silent fee; ask for the spread vs mid-market.
- Local acquiring beats cross-border for auth and cost when volume justifies it.
- DCC is usually a bad deal for customers and can increase disputes.
- Settlement currency and timing drive cash flow; reserves and holds matter more than basis points.
- Real-time payments (RTP/FedNow) are irrevocable—treat them like cash.
Typical Costs (directional)
- Cross-border fee: 0.6–1.0% on top of interchange.
- FX markup: 50–150 bps over mid-market (ask for the number, not “competitive”).
- DCC: Customer pays inflated rate; you may see higher dispute risk.
Local vs Cross-Border
- Local acquiring: Better auth rates, lower FX/spread; needs local entity/banking.
- Cross-border: Faster to launch; higher costs and lower auth.
- Rule of thumb: If a country is >10–15% of volume, explore local acquiring.
RTP/FedNow Irrevocability Warning
- Bank push payments can’t be clawed back.
- High social-engineering risk (BEC, invoice redirection).
- Use only with trusted counterparties; add out-of-band verification for new bank details.
Multi-Currency Cash Flow Ops
- Decide where conversion happens (at capture, at payout, or at bank).
- Holding balances: good if you spend in that currency; bad if you always convert later.
- Reconciliation: multi-currency payouts complicate accounting; align settlement currency with ledger.
- See also: Payout Strategy.
DCC (Dynamic Currency Conversion)
- Usually worse rate for the customer; expect complaints and possible disputes.
- Offer local currency by default; let customer opt in only if they insist.
Ask Your Processor
- “What’s our FX spread vs mid-market, in bps?”
- “Do you charge cross-border and FX markup together?”
- “Can we settle in local currency? What are the payout timings and fees?”
- “Can we disable DCC by default?”
- “Do you support local acquiring in [target countries]?”
Where This Breaks
- Ignoring FX until margins shrink.
- Running all EU volume as US cross-border (auth loss + extra fees).
- Accepting RTP/FedNow from unknowns (irreversible loss).
- Multi-currency without accounting alignment.
Next Steps
Reducing FX costs?
- Ask for spread in bps - Not "competitive"
- Evaluate local acquiring - If country >10-15% volume
- Understand DCC risks - Usually bad for customers
Managing multi-currency cash flow?
- Decide conversion timing - At capture, payout, or bank
- Align with accounting - Settlement currency = ledger
- Review payout strategy - Multi-currency details
Handling RTP/FedNow?
- Know irrevocability risk - Can't claw back
- Use only with trusted parties - High BEC risk
- Verify new bank details - Out-of-band confirmation
Related
- International Payments - Country-specific methods
- Buying Payments - Processor selection
- Settlement & Reconciliation - Funding flows
- Payout Strategy - Cash flow optimization
- Going Global - International expansion guide
- Interchange - Fee structures
- Bank Transfers - ACH alternatives
- Real-Time Payments - RTP/FedNow
- Reading Statements - Fee analysis
- Processor Management - Acquirer relationships