Visa 13.4 - Counterfeit Merchandise
Cardholder claims merchandise received was counterfeit or not genuine.
Overview
Counterfeit disputes allege the product is fake, not authentic, or illegitimately branded. These can be serious allegations with legal implications beyond just the chargeback.
When This Code Applies
- Product is alleged to be counterfeit
- Item lacks authenticity markers
- Brand claims item is fake
- Product fails authenticity verification
- Unauthorized reproduction of branded goods
Conditions for Valid Dispute
Cardholder Must
- Claim merchandise is counterfeit
- Attempt to resolve with merchant (usually)
- May need to return merchandise
Evidence of Counterfeit
- Missing authenticity tags/certificates
- Quality differs from genuine
- Brand verification fails
- Packaging discrepancies
- Serial number issues
Time Frames
| Scenario | Dispute Window |
|---|---|
| Standard | 120 days from transaction |
| From delivery | 120 days from delivery date |
Representment Options
1. Merchandise Is Genuine
Evidence required:
- Authenticity certificate
- Proof of authorized distribution
- Brand letter confirming authenticity
- Purchase from manufacturer documentation
- Serial number verification
2. Never Claimed to Be Branded
Evidence required:
- Product listing (no brand claims)
- Generic description used
- No trademark usage
- Clear non-branded marketing
3. Licensed/Authorized Product
Evidence required:
- License agreement
- Authorization letter from brand
- Authorized dealer documentation
- Supply chain proof
4. Cardholder Did Not Return
Evidence required:
- Return instructions provided
- No return received
- Cardholder kept merchandise
Prevention Strategies
Supply Chain
- Authorized sources only - Buy from licensed distributors
- Document chain of custody - Track from manufacturer
- Authenticity verification - Check before listing
- Supplier vetting - Verify supplier legitimacy
Product Documentation
- Keep certificates - Authenticity documentation
- Serial number records - Track each item
- Photos before shipping - Document authenticity markers
- Invoice from supplier - Prove legitimate source
Listings
- Don't claim brands you can't prove - Risk not worth it
- Use "inspired by" carefully - Legal minefield
- Clear descriptions - State exactly what it is
- No trademark infringement - Legal compliance
Fulfillment
- Verify authenticity before shipping - Quality control
- Include certificates - Ship with documentation
- Branded packaging - If authorized
- Serial number records - For tracking
Win Rate Expectations
| Defense Type | Expected Win Rate |
|---|---|
| Authenticity certificate | 70-85% |
| Authorized dealer proof | 65-80% |
| Never claimed branded | 60-75% |
| No documentation | Under 20% |
Common Mistakes
- Selling grey market goods - Authenticity questionable
- No supply chain documentation - Can't prove source
- Buying from unknown suppliers - Risk of fakes
- Brand claims without proof - Liability exposure
Legal Considerations
Counterfeit allegations may have implications beyond chargebacks:
- Trademark infringement claims
- Customs seizures
- Legal action from brands
- Account termination
If you're selling genuine branded goods: Get authorization documentation.
If receiving counterfeit claims on genuine goods: Consider contacting the brand for verification support.
Related Codes
- 13.3 - Not as Described
- 13.5 - Misrepresentation
- 13.1 - Not Received