Mastercard 4870 - Chip Liability Shift
- A counterfeit chip card ran and the chip never got read. The loss lands on whoever skipped EMV.
- Chip records and PIN verification can support a defense. They don't guarantee the outcome
- Follow your processor's certified fallback steps and preserve the authorization and clearing data
- Check the filing condition and regional rule. Use your notice's response date
- Track fallback by terminal. Investigate a rise against its own baseline
Got this code?
Your deadline: The date on your notice wins. Ask your processor if it isn't clear: the network's issuer filing window isn't your response deadline.
The claim: A counterfeit EMV chip card ran at a terminal that didn't process the chip properly. Liability shifts to your acquirer, and your acquirer passes it to you.
Records that answer it:
- The EMV cryptogram and chip data in the authorization
- The PIN verification indicator, if a PIN was entered
- Terminal logs showing chip attempts before any fallback
Next: Decide whether it's worth fighting, then fill in the response outline for this claim and follow the Representment Workflow.
When This Code Applies
- Counterfeit chip card transaction
- Terminal didn't process chip (fallback to swipe)
- Chip malfunction with improper fallback handling
- Terminal not EMV-capable when chip card presented
Liability Shift Rules
Liability Shifts TO Merchant When:
| Scenario | Liability |
|---|---|
| Chip card + non-chip terminal | Merchant |
| Chip card + fallback to swipe (improper) | Merchant |
| Chip card + manual entry | Merchant |
| Chip malfunction + no chip attempt | Merchant |
Liability Stays WITH Issuer When:
| Scenario | Liability |
|---|---|
| Chip card + chip read + PIN verified | Issuer |
| Chip malfunction + documented fallback | Confirm the transaction coding and applicable regional rule |
| Non-chip card at any terminal | Issuer |
| Online PIN verified | Issuer |
Chip Fallback Requirements
When the chip won't read, you must:
- Follow the certified chip-read steps - Ask your processor what its terminal requires and log failures
- Use fallback only after failed attempts - It isn't your first move
- Indicate fallback in authorization - Proper coding
- Document the technical issue - Terminal logs
Time Frames
| Region | Chargeback Window |
|---|---|
| Standard | Confirm the chip-liability condition and start event |
| Europe ATM/Maestro | Confirm the product and regional rule |
Use the response date on your notice. The network's issuer filing window isn't your merchant response deadline. Ask your acquirer for the current condition, regional rule and edition before relying on a filing-window summary.
Representment Options
Valid Defenses
- Chip was properly read - Transaction was EMV chip-read
- PIN verified online - Cardholder entered correct PIN
- Technical fallback documented - Proper chip failure handling
- Non-chip card - Card didn't have chip capability
- Refund issued - Transaction already credited
Evidence Required
| Defense | Documentation |
|---|---|
| Chip read | EMV cryptogram, chip data in auth |
| PIN verified | PIN verification indicator |
| Fallback | Terminal logs showing chip attempts |
| Non-chip card | Card verification showing no chip |
Message Text Requirements
When representing, include appropriate text in DE 72:
| Defense | Message Text |
|---|---|
| Chip read | CHIP READ |
| PIN verified | PIN VERIFIED |
| Proper fallback | TECH FALLBACK |
Second Presentment Time Frames
| Region | Window |
|---|---|
| Standard | 45 calendar days |
| Costa Rica | 10 calendar days |
| Kazakhstan | 30 calendar days |
| Nigeria | 2 business days |
| Tanzania | 20 calendar days |
Technical Requirements
EMV Data Elements
Authorization must include:
- DE 55: EMV chip data
- DE 22: POS entry mode (chip read indicator)
- DE 23: Card sequence number (if applicable)
Terminal Requirements
- Certified EMV terminal
- Current chip key certifications
- Proper fallback configuration
- Transaction logging enabled
Which defenses hold up
| Scenario | How it holds up |
|---|---|
| Chip + PIN verified | Strongest |
| Documented fallback | Weaker |
| No chip read, no fallback documentation | Rarely wins |
Track your own win rate by reason code instead of relying on a general figure.
Related Codes
Prevention Strategies
Terminal Management
- Ensure EMV certification - All terminals certified
- Regular maintenance - Keep chip readers clean and functional
- Software updates - Current terminal software
- Staff training - Proper chip card handling
Transaction Processing
- Always attempt chip - Never skip to swipe
- Document failures - Log chip read errors
- Follow fallback procedures - As defined by network
- Review exception reports - Monitor fallback rates
Monitoring
- Track fallback rate - Compare each terminal with its own baseline; investigate a change
- Terminal health checks - Regular testing
- Alert on anomalies - Fallbacks shouldn't spike overnight
- Root cause analysis - Investigate chip failures