Skip to main content

Visa 13.3 - Not as Described / Defective

TL;DR
  • The customer got the item. They're saying it isn't what you sold, or it showed up broken
  • Visa expects them to contact you first. If they never did, lead with that
  • Your listing on the day of the sale is the evidence. Photos, specs, return policy
  • The window is 120 days. You get 30 days to answer

Your customer received the order and says it's wrong or broken. That's a 13.3.

When This Code Applies

  • Product doesn't match the description
  • Wrong item shipped
  • Merchandise arrived defective
  • Service fell short of what you promised
  • Features or components missing
  • Counterfeit goods received

Conditions for Valid Dispute

The cardholder has to have received the goods, and to say what's wrong with them. They're also expected to try you first.

Returns matter. If the item was returnable and they kept it, that's a hole in their case.

Time Frames

ScenarioDispute Window
Standard120 days from transaction
From delivery120 days from delivery date

Representment Options

1. Product Matched Description

Evidence required:

  • Product listing and description at time of sale
  • Photos of the actual item
  • Specifications comparison
  • Proof nothing was defective

2. Cardholder Never Returned It

Evidence required:

  • Return policy, clearly stated
  • Return instructions you sent
  • Proof they kept the merchandise
  • No return receipt

3. Refund Already Issued

Evidence required:

  • Refund confirmation
  • Transaction showing the credit
  • Settlement records
  • Customer acknowledgment

4. Issue Resolved

Evidence required:

  • Replacement sent
  • Repair completed
  • Credit issued
  • Customer confirmed the fix

5. As-Is or Final Sale

Evidence required:

  • Clear disclosure of condition
  • No warranty terms
  • Cardholder acknowledgment
  • Policy shown in the checkout flow

Win Rate Expectations

Defense TypeExpected Win Rate
Product matches (with photos)60-75%
No return attempted50-70%
Refund already issued85-95%
Description was accurate55-70%
No evidenceUnder 25%

Where This Breaks

Most 13.3 losses trace back to the listing, not the dispute.

Thin photos are the big one. Show three angles when the buyer expected six and you'll lose. Wrong dimensions count too. So does a color that reads differently on a screen.

The rest is process. A hard return policy sends people straight to their bank. So does ignoring the first complaint email.

Photograph what you ship, before you ship it. That habit wins more 13.3 cases than anything else here.

For Digital Goods

There's no package to return, so the argument shifts to use. Access logs, download records and login timestamps show they got what they paid for. Your terms of service help too, if they clicked to accept.

Trials prevent more of these than any refund policy. People who tried it first don't dispute it.

  • 13.1 - Not Received
  • 13.2 - Cancelled Recurring
  • 13.4 - Counterfeit Merchandise
  • 13.5 - Misrepresentation

Next Steps

Got this chargeback?

  1. Compare the listing to what shipped → Does it match?
  2. Check for prior contact → Did they complain first?
  3. Pull your photos of the shipped item
  4. Respond within 30 days → Representment Workflow

Prevent the next one:

  1. Shoot more photos than you think you need
  2. Photo-document every item before it ships

See Also